I need a Sledge Hammer

When are people in this country going to wake up. Seriously. It is getting to be very frustrating dealing with people who do not even understand the concept of freedom.

Sure you have the freedom to give up your freedom. But why would you do it? Sure you can blame president Bush for the stupid Patriot Act but why do you vote for others who tell you to your face they will take away your freedom and limit your choice?

Does anyone stop and think any more? Do you really understand the meaning of hypocrisy. Seriously.

I run into people all the time who are aghast that I do not support Barrack Obama. When I ask them to tell me why they are supporting him no body can tell me outside of the sound bites why they support him.

He will bring change, they say. Bill Clinton promised the same kind of change but other than redefining the meaning of sex, what change did he bring? And of that change, if there was any, did you like it? The answer is usually no they did not like the change Bill Clinton brought about.

So many people don't have health care. So I ask do you like the government telling you what to do in any aspect of your life? They usually answer no. So why then would you want the government to tell you when and where you could get your health care? They wouldn't, they admit. So why vote for someone who says he or she is going to take over the health care system? They wouldn't they say. But you will vote for Obama? Yes, they say. I want to bash my head with a hammer at this point.

Do you like being taxed, I ask. Well, no, they reply. Do you think you pay too much in taxes, I ask. Usually they reply with a resounding yes. So why would you support someone who says to your face he is going to raise your taxes? But he represents change they say. The kind of change you want then, I reply. Not exactly they say.

Where is that hammer?

You probably want out of Iraq. But should would bail out as soon as possible even if it means leaving the Iraqi people in an insecure position? Well that would not be right, they say. Oh, so the people of Iraq deserve freedom and they deserve to be able to live in peace then? Well everyone on the planet deserves to live in peace, they reply. Then taking out the troops now and ending that peace and leaving the people of Iraq to the terrorist and the evils of Iran is OK then. Well, no they respond with concern in their voice. So Obama wants to get out now and do just that, should you still support him? Well yes, they say. They use that word change again.

I need a huge hammer.

So you don't agree with Obama on taxes, health care, your freedom, the battle for Iraq yet you still support him? I am sorry but I just don't understand why you would?

Well he is so eloquent in his speech. He is good looking and he is black.

Huh?

I tell them about some of his gaffs only I lie and say George Bush said those things and they say, he is an idiot and needs to be impeached. Then I correct myself and say (and prove) that Obama said those things and they still don't believe. I tell them where they can hear him and see him say those things (57 states) and they still think he is a brilliant man.

How can you say he is brilliant when you just said George Bush is an idiot for saying the same thing even thought GW didn't actually say those things? Um is their response.

Obama is only half black and he is half white and his father was not a slave descendant. I am part black and I am descended from slaves. Would I be a better president? No, they reply, you are not a democrat.

OK, I know have a sledge hammer.

Are we really this dumb as a nation?

I think one good whack with an 8lb sledge will put me out of my misery.

WMD's wer not a lie nor a joke, But the Liberals would like you to think so

There has been a lot of talk about the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq or the lack there of. We didn't seem to find many up to date weapons after our invasion five years ago. The calls began to go out that Bush lied and that there never were WMD in Iraq.

Well we know that Saddam did have such weapons because he used them on his own people. He had scud missiles that he sent to Israel during the first Gulf Conflict. He could have easily modified the warheads to carry chemical weapons and he did do so.

We know, though he was not able to get his hands on any, that Saddam was looking to acquire nuclear material or weapons.

There has been a lot of talk about how no WMD's were found in Iraq. However the dirty little secret is that if you notice they always say none were found in IRAQ. They do not say that Saddam never had them and was not trying to get more or build more.

In fact just about every report indicates that Saddam was trying to rebuild his WMD machine. And report after report indicates what intelligent and logical people know. Saddam and his high ranking trusted Generals began shipping his WMD's to his ally in Syria.

We also know that Saddam was willing to send some of his military equipment to his enemy, Iran to keep it from being captured or destroyed by the American Army.

The problem is the American people have been falsely led to believe that Saddam did not have any WMD. But we can see report and story after report and story that he did and was looking for more. Even newspapers that are not typically conservative have delved into this and dug up some interesting facts.

The New York Sun had a report back in January of 2006 about this. This was about the time that the Liberal Democrats were starting to ratchet up their lies and rhetoric for the run for the White House.

A Lebanese report back in 2004 indicated that a WMD program was being hidden in Syria and that Saddam and even North Korea were in on it.

The news is so prevalent that even the bloggesphere has a buzz about it. One blog, Stix, that says this;

There is a report to come out that says Saddam transfered weapons to Syria. Who would have thought of that???

An upcoming joint US-Israel report on the September 6 IAF strike on a Syrian facility will claim that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein transferred weapons of mass destruction to the country, Channel 2 stated Monday.

Furthermore, according to a report leaked to the TV channel, Syria has arrested 10 intelligence officials following the assassination of Hizbullah terror chief Imad Mughniyeh.

So it would seem that just about everyone knows that Saddam had WMD and was willing to use them and was willing to get more of them. So then why do the Democrats and the Liberal American press want to keep up with the lie that they did not exist?

Simple. They want power. They want to paint Bush as a liar and a thief. They want to portray our President as a spoiled little brat that is doing his fathers bidding by getting the man that he could not get when he was President.

They want to say that Republican Conservatives are nothing but war machine and oil baron promoters. They want to get into office so bad so they can take your freedom away. Why else would they be so willing to lie and put you and your family and our country at risk? They have their own agenda and they have their own WMD.

The American and Wold Liberal media is out to get the Democrats in office. They know how good it was when Bill Clinton was President. They want those years back. They want more open borders. They want more free transfer of classified and sensitive information and technology. They want the US people to be more vulnerable because in a way it makes their own nations more safe.

They want a weaker USA. In short, they know who will give them what they want. Liberal Democrats. So the next time you hear one of them say that Bush lied or there were NEVER WMD in Iraq:

Stop. Think. Vote.

Battle in Iraq, a position paper

The War in Iraq.

First we need to get one thing straight. It is not the “War” in Iraq. That is like saying it was the War of the Bulge. That is wrong because it misses the big picture. It is the “Battle” of Iraq. Its the War on Terror.

The main stream press has made this battle seem like a stand alone war. That misses the big picture. Iraq is a part of the whole war on terror. Even the White House mentions it wrongly on numerous occasions.

If you notice we don't call it the War in Afghanistan. The main stream press calls it a conflict or battle. Why then do they make a distinction with Iraq? Simple, its because the left does not want you, the general public, to see the correlation between Iraq and the war on terror.

The left fails to tell you about how much a ruthless dictator Saddam Hussein was. They forget to mention that this man killed thousands of his own people using weapons of mass destruction. They forget to tell you about how Saddam sponsored terrorism. They forget to tell you that Saddam offered to pay the families of suicide bombers in Israel. They forget to tell you that Saddam ignored nearly all of the United Nations resolutions that he agreed to at the end of Desert Storm.

You also hear the Democrat presidential candidates talk about pulling out of Iraq. They talk about how they would “end the War in Iraq”. The problem is that they know there is no war there. Its a battle within the war on terror. They also know that they cannot pull all troops out of there any time soon or they will create a vacuum that would be filled by just about every radical Islamist in the world.

They also fail to tell the American people that pulling out of Iraq does not mean pulling all troops out of the Middle East.

Here is the truth about the War on Terror and the Middle East. We, the USA, cannot pull out of those nations in the middle east. No President will pull out all troops out of Iraq when they take office and for good reason. They also know that the threat to the American people here and abroad remains great and that pulling out as the radicals demand, would in no way reduce the danger to our nation and its citizens abroad.

Look at Spain. They pulled out yet still suffer attacks from Islamist. England has announced its pullout and reduced its troops to the bear minimum yet they still are targets for attacks. This is not a war for oil. We can see that by the price at the pump and in our home heating oil tanks. We have fuel bills that are the highest they have ever been. Hardly a war for oil.

This is not a touchy featly thing that will just go away because we want the world to love us again. The United States is loved the world over by the people of the world. Yes world governments may not like us so much but that is for a number of reasons including just plain old jealousy. The people of the world still risk life and limb to get into this country legally and illegally. You don't find so many people trying to get into any other nation as much or as often as they do in the USA.

In short, there is no pull out in the near future for our troops. It is not the USA that needs to work to be liked. It is the radicals that need to accept our right to live on this planet in peace and if they do not accept that basic fact, we should respond in a way that they understand even if that means occupation of some other nations.
This is a world wide threat. No nation is safe so long as these radicals roam free to reek havoc on innocent people. As long as our armed forces engage the enemy on their turf, the chance of them being able to successfully hit us on our own soil is less.

That is what this War on Terror is all about. Our safety. Indeed, its about our very survival. Simple. Logical. The right thing to do for you and your children.